The Compliance Balancing Act
Financial services teams are under pressure to deliver digital experiences quickly while satisfying regulators, banking partners, and internal risk committees. Waiting until *after* launch to address compliance creates rework, outages, and lost trust.
Why Compliance Frameworks Matter
Working from recognised frameworks gives product, engineering, and finance stakeholders a shared vocabulary. Instead of debating opinions, teams map requirements to specific controls and evidence.
Primary Frameworks We See
**PCI DSS** for cardholder data environments**SOC 2** for trust, privacy, and operational controls**Local banking mandates** (CBN, FCA, FDIC, etc.)**AML/KYC** and sanctions screening obligationsBuild Compliance into Discovery
1. **Classify data flows** before a single line of code ships.
2. **Document shared responsibilities** between bank sponsors, payment processors, and internal squads.
3. **Catalogue third-party services** (ID verification, fraud, analytics) and capture their attestations.
Control Implementation Patterns
Technical
Segmented environments with infrastructure-as-codeAutomated vulnerability scanning as part of CI/CDEncryption key management with rotation policiesOperational
Evidence collection embedded in pull request templatesRunbooks for incident response and regulatory notificationsQuarterly control reviews with finance and engineering co-ownersMeasuring Compliance Health
Create a scorecard that tracks:
Coverage of required controls per frameworkTime to remediate audit findingsEvidence freshness (e.g., configs, policies, runbooks)External attestation milestonesBringing It Together
Compliance is not a blocker—it is an enabler for sustainable growth. Teams that invest in shared frameworks early remove friction from bank partnerships, investor diligence, and market expansions.
**Next steps:** run a two-week compliance readiness sprint, map your controls to business objectives, and give every squad member clarity on their role in staying audit-ready.